OpenRouter × Metabase

How to build OpenRouter dashboards in Metabase

OpenRouter is a unified API gateway for hundreds of LLMs that tracks usage, spend, and latency across every model and provider you route through. Metabase is where you turn that LLM telemetry into shared, trustworthy dashboards. This guide covers two complementary paths: a lightweight API + CLI route that pulls live data from the OpenRouter activity API and loads a CSV into Metabase with the Metabase CLI, and a durable pipeline route that syncs OpenRouter rollups into a database so you can build dashboards anyone can read.

Heads up: Metabase connects to databases and warehouses — it does not ship a native OpenRouter connector, and a BI warehouse is the wrong home for raw prompts and completions. Sync aggregates, trace summaries, and scores — rollups, experiments, cost records — and leave the payloads in OpenRouter.

How do you connect OpenRouter to Metabase?

Most teams combine both routes: use quick exports and CLI uploads for a fast first pass, then move recurring cost and quality reporting to a warehouse-backed model.

1 · API + CLI route (AI-assisted)

Live data in, quick analysis out

Pair a scripted export against the OpenRouter activity API with the Metabase CLI. Pull a scoped usage slice to CSV, then load it into Metabase as a ready-to-query table and model.

Best for
  • Quick lookups such as "show me llm spend by model and provider"
  • Loading a OpenRouter export into Metabase in seconds
  • Spot-checks and one-off analyses without a warehouse
Trade-offs
  • Great for exploration, not governed cost or quality reporting
  • Use read-only or scoped credentials wherever the server supports them
  • CSV uploads are snapshots — refresh or move to the pipeline for history
2 · Pipeline route (warehouse-backed)

Durable dashboards with history

Sync OpenRouter rollups and metadata into a database or warehouse with an export pipeline or API scripts, then point Metabase at it.

Best for
  • OpenRouter cost and quality dashboards leaders depend on
  • Joining OpenRouter data with revenue, product usage, or infrastructure cost
  • Long-run trends for llm spend by model and provider and token usage trends by model
Trade-offs
  • You own the refresh schedule and the rollup grain
  • Sync aggregates and entities — not raw prompt/response payloads
  • Cost and quality definitions must stay consistent across apps and teams

What can you analyze from OpenRouter data in Metabase?

Each view below is built from daily usage and spend by model, plus the per-request generation costs, provider routing, and API-key-level usage your sync exposes:

  • LLM spend by model and provider
  • Token usage trends by model
  • Cost per 1M tokens by model
  • Requests and reasoning-token growth
  • Spend by API key and team member

Which OpenRouter dashboards should you build in Metabase?

For: Eng leads, finance partners

Spend overview

The headline spend picture leaders ask for.

  • LLM spend per day and per week (line)
  • Spend by model (bar)
  • Spend by app or team (stacked bar)
  • Month-over-month spend growth (number + trend)
For: AI engineers

Unit costs

Whether efficiency improves as volume grows.

  • Cost per 1M tokens by model (bar)
  • Cost per request trend (line)
  • Prompt vs. completion token ratio (line)
  • Cache hit rate and estimated savings (combo)
For: Product, growth

Cost per user and feature

Where LLM unit economics actually stand.

  • Cost per active user (line)
  • Cost by feature (bar)
  • Top users or tenants by spend (table)
  • Cost vs. revenue per feature, where joined (table)
For: Platform

Usage hygiene

Waste and drift to clean up.

  • Requests and spend by API key (table)
  • Spend on failed or retried requests (bar)
  • Traffic still on deprecated or pricier models (table)
  • Spend vs. budget (number + trend)

How do you use the OpenRouter MCP server with the Metabase CLI?

Pair the OpenRouter MCP server with the Metabase CLI for fast, hands-on analysis. For usage analytics the scripted API export below does the heavy lifting, and MCP covers interactive lookups; the Metabase CLI's upload command loads CSV data into Metabase and creates a ready-to-query table and model.

Example workflow

  • Run the export script against the OpenRouter activity API for daily usage and spend rollups by model and application.
  • Export the result as CSV, keeping stable IDs, apps, models, environments, token counts, costs, and timestamps.
  • Run mb upload csv to load it into Metabase as a table and model, then build questions and dashboards on top.

Be honest about the limits

  • Scripted exports are excellent for exploration, not scheduled reporting.
  • A CSV upload is a snapshot; refresh it with mb upload replace or move to the pipeline for real history.
  • Daily usage rollups are required for spend trends — a single export is a snapshot, and some usage APIs only return a trailing window.
  • mb upload csv needs an uploads database configured under Admin → Settings → Uploads.

How do you set up OpenRouter MCP and the Metabase CLI?

OpenRouter MCP serverofficial

Transport
Hosted remote MCP via Streamable HTTP
Auth
OAuth through OpenRouter
Best for
Live scoped lookup and export

Metabase CLIofficial

Install
npm install -g @metabase/cli
Auth
mb auth login
Load data
mb upload csv --file data.csv
Requires
An uploads database (Admin → Settings → Uploads)
MCPExample MCP client config
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openrouter": {
      "url": "https://mcp.openrouter.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The hosted MCP is developer-assistant oriented — model search, pricing lookups, credits, docs — not an analytics export surface, so this guide's numbers come from the activity API below. Note the OAuth flow mints a scoped API key with a 7-day expiry and a $10 default spend limit.

APIExport the last 30 days of OpenRouter usage to CSV
# Requires a management (provisioning) key, not a regular inference key
curl -s https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/activity \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_MANAGEMENT_KEY" \
  | jq -r '.data[] | [.date, .model, .provider_name, .requests,
      .prompt_tokens, .completion_tokens, .usage] | @csv' \
  > openrouter-activity.csv

The activity endpoint returns daily usage per model and endpoint for the last 30 completed UTC days only — schedule the export daily to accumulate history. Check field names against the response; per-request costs reconcile via GET /api/v1/generation.

TerminalLoad a OpenRouter CSV with the Metabase CLI
# Install the Metabase CLI
npm install -g @metabase/cli

# Log in (opens your browser; requires Metabase v62+)
mb auth login --url https://your-metabase.example.com

# Load a daily-usage-and-spend-by-model export — creates a table AND a model
mb upload csv --file openrouter-daily-usage-and-spend-by-model.csv --collection root

# Refresh that same table later from a new export
mb upload replace <table-id> --file openrouter-daily-usage-and-spend-by-model.csv

Can you generate a OpenRouter dashboard with AI?

Yes. Use the prompt below with any assistant that can run shell scripts and the Metabase CLI. It works end to end: if OpenRouter tables already exist in Metabase it analyzes those; otherwise it pulls scoped, summarized data, loads it with mb upload csv, then builds the dashboard and caveats any metric that needs missing history.

Prompt for creating a OpenRouter LLM Cost Overview dashboard
Create a polished Metabase dashboard for OpenRouter llm cost analytics.
Work end to end: get the data into Metabase if it isn't there yet, then build.

Goal: Help engineering, product, and finance partners understand spend by model and app, unit costs, cost per user, cache savings, and budget tracking from OpenRouter data.

Step 1 — Find or load the data:
- First, check what already exists in Metabase (search for openrouter tables and
  models). If durable OpenRouter data is already present — synced from a warehouse
  or uploaded earlier — use it and skip to Step 2.
- If nothing is there, run a scripted export against the OpenRouter activity API (this page includes a
  working script):
  daily usage and spend by model, plus per-request generation costs, provider routing, API-key-level usage.
  Prefer aggregated or rollup views over raw traces. Write each result to a CSV,
  then load it with the Metabase CLI — run "mb upload csv --file <export>.csv" so
  each upload creates a table and a ready-to-query model. Use "mb upload replace
  <table-id> --file <export>.csv" to refresh an existing table instead of creating
  duplicates.

Step 2 — Inspect before querying:
Do not assume exact table or column names. Inspect available fields, apps, models,
environments, timestamps, and whether rollups or history exist before creating
duration or trend cards.

Important:
- Build on whatever data is present; don't claim Metabase connects natively to
  OpenRouter — it reads a database or CLI-uploaded tables.
- Never load raw prompt/response payloads into Metabase; use rollups, trace
  summaries, and experiment- or score-grain data.
- Only compute latency percentiles and durations when the required timestamps
  or pre-aggregated percentile fields exist.
- Exclude test, staging, and playground traffic from headline cost and quality
  cards, and segment by environment where the field exists.
- A single CSV is a point-in-time snapshot: only build trend cards if there is a
  usable date column or multiple periods have been uploaded.

Dashboard title: OpenRouter LLM Cost Overview

Sections:
1. Executive summary: Spend last 30 days; MoM growth; Cost per request;
   Cost per active user; Cache savings.
2. Spend: Daily/weekly spend by model, app, and team.
3. Unit costs: Cost per 1M tokens by model; prompt vs. completion ratio;
   cache hit rate.
4. Users and features: Cost per active user; cost by feature; top tenants.
5. Hygiene: Spend by API key; failed-request spend; deprecated-model traffic.

Filters: Date range, App, Model, Environment, User or team, Status.

Output: Build the dashboard if you have permission; otherwise provide the exact
questions, SQL, model definitions, and layout. Include caveats for any metric
that cannot be calculated from the available data.

How do you sync OpenRouter data into a database or warehouse?

For dashboards that need history and reliability, land OpenRouter rollups and metadata in a database first, then connect Metabase to that database.

Connector options

  • Direct database or export pipeline — use the vendor's storage or export path when it reaches a database you control.
  • Custom pipeline — use the OpenRouter activity API for control over rollup grain, fields, and refresh cadence.
  • API + CSV — use this for quick exploration and one-off slices.

No managed connector or warehouse export exists — schedule the activity export daily into your warehouse to build history beyond the API's 30-day window, and use the generation endpoint to reconcile per-request costs. It's a small, well-shaped dataset: one row per day per model per endpoint.

Notes

  • Decide the rollup grain first (daily per app/model is the workhorse) — it drives warehouse cost and every trend card.
  • Land raw entity tables first, then build clean Metabase models on top.
  • Normalize app, model, provider, window-start, token-count, and cost-USD fields.
  • Strip or hash prompt/response payloads and user identifiers before they reach the warehouse — cost and quality analytics don't need them.

How should you model OpenRouter data in Metabase?

Core tables

TableGrainKey columns
llm_request_rollupsone row per model per endpoint per daymodel, provider_name, window_start, requests, prompt_tokens, completion_tokens, reasoning_tokens, cost_usd
llm_generationsone row per reconciled generation (sampled or audited)id, model, provider_name, created_at, native_prompt_tokens, native_completion_tokens, cost_usd
llm_api_key_rollupsone row per API key per dayapi_key_hash, window_start, requests, total_tokens, cost_usd

Modeling advice

  • Build a clean llm_request_rollups model with common columns across tools, so multi-source dashboards don't fork definitions.
  • Separate entity tables (apps, models, datasets, prompts) from time-series rollups and trace- or score-grain tables.
  • Exclude test, staging, and playground traffic from headline cost and quality metrics; keep environment as an explicit column.
  • Use stable IDs for app, model, and experiment joins; display names and model aliases change.

Which OpenRouter metrics should you track in Metabase?

MetricDefinitionNotes
Cost per 1M tokensBlended spend divided by total tokens, normalized per million.The cleanest way to compare models and catch price drift.
LLM cost per userLLM spend divided by active users of LLM features.The unit-economics headline — pair it with revenue per user.
Cache hit rateCached responses or tokens divided by total, per app.Cache reads are discounted, not free — model the real rate.
Token usagePrompt and completion tokens per period, by model and app.Watch the prompt:completion ratio — bloated prompts hide there.

What SQL powers OpenRouter dashboards in Metabase?

These assume a cleaned analytical model in a warehouse (PostgreSQL dialect). Adjust table and column names to match your pipeline.

Spend by model by monthPostgreSQL

Where the money goes, from daily rollups.

SELECT
  date_trunc('month', window_start) AS month,
  model,
  ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 2) AS cost_usd,
  SUM(prompt_tokens + completion_tokens) AS total_tokens
FROM llm_request_rollups
GROUP BY 1, model
ORDER BY 1, cost_usd DESC;
Cost per 1M tokens by modelPostgreSQL

The normalized unit cost that makes models comparable.

SELECT
  model,
  ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 2) AS cost_usd,
  SUM(prompt_tokens + completion_tokens) AS total_tokens,
  ROUND(
    1e6 * SUM(cost_usd)
    / NULLIF(SUM(prompt_tokens + completion_tokens), 0), 2
  ) AS cost_per_1m_tokens
FROM llm_request_rollups
WHERE window_start >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '30 days'
GROUP BY model
ORDER BY cost_usd DESC;
Cost per active user by monthPostgreSQL

The unit-economics headline from user-grain rollups.

SELECT
  date_trunc('month', window_start) AS month,
  ROUND(SUM(cost_usd), 2) AS cost_usd,
  COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) AS active_users,
  ROUND(
    SUM(cost_usd) / NULLIF(COUNT(DISTINCT user_id), 0), 4
  ) AS cost_per_active_user
FROM llm_user_rollups
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY 1;

What are common mistakes when analyzing OpenRouter in Metabase?

Syncing raw prompts and completions into the warehouse.→ Land rollups, trace summaries, and scores. Payloads are heavy, often contain user data, and belong in OpenRouter; the warehouse is for trends and joins.
Trending total spend without a usage denominator.→ Growing spend with faster-growing usage is efficiency, not waste. Report cost per request, per 1M tokens, and per user alongside the total.
Ignoring cache and batch discounts in unit costs.→ Cached and batched tokens are priced differently. Blend them into the effective rate, or your cost-per-token cards will drift from the invoice.
Building dashboards from live MCP lookups only.→ MCP is useful for exploration; durable dashboards need a database-backed model with history.

Related analytics

Related dashboards

Related integrations

FAQ

Does Metabase connect natively to OpenRouter?
No. Metabase reads databases and warehouses. Sync OpenRouter rollups and metadata into a database first, or upload a CSV with the Metabase CLI, then build Metabase models and dashboards on top.
Should Metabase replace OpenRouter?
No — they answer different questions. OpenRouter is built for engineers debugging and improving LLM behavior. Metabase is where you build governed, shareable reporting on top of the same data, and join it with revenue, product usage, and infrastructure cost.
Why does my OpenRouter spend differ from my provider invoice?
Gateway and proxy logs price tokens from published rates at request time; invoices add minimums, credits, caching discounts, and billing-period boundaries. Treat the request-level number as the analytical signal and reconcile monthly against the invoice — the trend matters more than a to-the-cent match. See cost per 1M tokens for the normalization that makes models comparable.
How do I attribute LLM spend to features and teams?
Tag every request at the source with app, feature, and team metadata — most proxies and tracing SDKs support custom properties — and carry those columns through the rollups. Retroactive attribution is guesswork; with the tags in place, cost per user and cost per feature become simple GROUP BYs.